Gift season: 3 questions to a rum that lands. Open the gift finder3 questions to a rum that lands →
6CD20EB0-A9E9-48EC-9AB8-EA2819EA8F44Jamaica Hampden The Nectar
Hampden The Nectar Of The Daily Drams <>H 2013 70cl bottle
Bottle
View 2
Aged rum · 9 years · 64.4%

Hampden The Nectar Of The Daily Drams <>H 2013

Nail polish and ripe pineapple on the nose, with the classic Hampden solvent-and-ester signature running through. On the palate it's fruity and warm with light vanilla, a touch of olive and a woody, slightly bitter finish. Several tasters call it a "characteristic" <>H, but note the 64.4% alcohol sits a bit hot and less integrated than its bigger siblings — give it air.

The community says
  • Classic <>H funk
  • Ripe tropical fruit
  • But: Alcohol dominates

Offers & prices

No shop currently delivers to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does Hampden The Nectar Of The Daily Drams <>H 2013 taste?

Summarized by AI from 42 community reviews.

Fruity, funky Hampden with pushy alcohol A recognizable Hampden with tropical fruit and glue notes, but many find the high-proof alcohol too dominant and slightly unbalanced. Solid rather than dazzling; several prefer other 2013 <>H bottlings.

Perfect for

Hampden fans who like high-ester funk and can handle cask strength

Less suitable for

Anyone put off by solvent notes or hot, high-proof alcohol

Experience level · Expert (4/5)

Style & occasion: Tropical & funkySipping neatCocktails & mixing

Full aroma profile Aroma families · nose & palate · top aromas
Flavor profile
Sweet & dessert
Spice
Wood
Dried fruit
Roasted & dark
Funk & ester
Vegetal & floral

15 of 42 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

Which glass for which rum? The community guide →

Recommendation

Your next rum

Each with how it differs from this rum.

Gifting rum? 3 questions to the right bottle

Community voices

What does the community say?

8.2/10 Very good

42 community reviews
12 selected write-ups on this page, all of them in the RumX app

Rate it in the app
Distribution of all 42 ratings
9–10 0%
8–9 64%
7–8 31%
6–7 5%
5–6 0%
4–5 0%
0–4 0%

Ranges include their upper bound: “7–8” means above 7 up to and including 8. See the full rating guide

Positive from 8.0 · Mixed 6.0–7.9 · Critical below 6.0

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Most helpful positive review

Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
Oct 20227,207 reviewsDenmark
8.4/10

Now we're getting somewhere. This one was far better than the previous one. Not super funky, but you can pick up the ester. Nicely fruity with light vanilla and wood.

Review by DomM

Most helpful mixed review

DomM
Oct 20251,038 reviewsGermany
7.7/10

I don’t particular like the nose - even after a long time in the Glas it is dominated by alcohol (or maybe nail polish if you are looking on the bright side) clearly oveewhelming any fruity notes. It is much better on the palate. However, here very much dominated by vanilla and sweetness I attribute to the cask. No Highlight unfortunately. Disclaimer: tasted alongside RX12016 which clearly didn’t help this one to shine (and is way better imo). Addon: Looking at a little 2013 <>H side-by-side today. On the nose the House of Cane bottling takes the crown with TCoR and Swells Constantia taking second place. The Nectar is the only real outlier, not able to compete with the pack. Roots comes with a bit more overripe notes, while TWJ is a bit stronger on solvent notes. Both are very nice as well. On the palate the crown goes to The House of Cane, again. Very high intensity with Hampden funk and fruits nicely balanced by some sweetness and cookie notes. CoR and TWJ both show an intense <>H profile as well, excellent. The SdS Constantia presents the most balanced profile. Very nice to drink indeed. Roots looses on the palate, unfortunately. There is a distinct note of lightly peated Whisky in the bottling. That’s not bad, but doesn’t benefit the rum imo. The Nectar, again, cannot fully win my heart. The cask presumably had less influence, leaving the bottling in a more alcoholic and less balanced state.

Review by Rodolphe

Rodolphe
Nov 2024318 reviewsFrance
8.3/10

A not very old Hampden <>H, nice typical style for this age. Fruity, creamy and lively.

Expert reviews

Reviews from RumX's blog partners, independent experts who have tasted, evaluated, and described this rum.

Community shelf

36 bottles logged by 32 collectors.

A collector's bottle.

11% opened, 4 emptied.

32 sealed 0 open 4 emptied

What did the community pay for Hampden The Nectar Of The Daily Drams <>H 2013?

Community paid 76–111 €.

Purchase prices reported by members, not a shop price. Avg. 102 €. Full price & collection history in RX+ →

36 purchased · 44 tasted · 10 wishlist · as of

Details about Hampden The Nectar Of The Daily Drams <>H 2013

A Pot Still Rum from Jamaica, bottled by The Nectar, at 64.4%.

DistilleryHampden
CountryJamaica
BottlerThe Nectar
CategoryPot Still Rum
Raw materialMolasses
DistillationPot Still
ABV64.4%
Age9 years
Vintage2013
Mark<>H
Sugar0 g/L
Volume70cl

Read on in the RumX Guide

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good your rum Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.