3B88374C-718A-421F-A06E-2D7C79F4D343Jamaica Long Pond Romdeluxe
Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005 70cl bottle
Long Pond · Jamaica · 68,5%

Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005

8.6/10 59 community reviews ↓
Loved by Dr.Django, Galli33 & 57 more

For experienced palates: a powerful 68.5% Long Pond VRW that rewards time in the glass. RumX members love its mix of coconut, tropical fruits, esters and assertive oak with a long, tannic finish.

  • Complex profile
  • Great fruit‑oak balance
  • Very long finish
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.
RumX is featured in Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Details about Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005

CountryJamaica
DistilleryLong Pond
BottlerRomdeluxe
CategoryPot Still Rum
ABV68,5%
Volume70cl
Age16 years
Vintage2005
Cask no.#6

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

How does Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005 taste?

Aggregated from 59 community reviews.

Intense coconut‑fruity Long Pond powerhouse For experienced palates: a powerful 68.5% Long Pond VRW that rewards time in the glass. RumX members love its mix of coconut, tropical fruits, esters and assertive oak with a long, tannic finish.

Perfect for

Seasoned enthusiasts of Jamaican pot still who enjoy high‑proof Long Pond with coconut, mango and strong cask influence, and who like to let a rum sit and slowly open up.

Less suitable for

Beginners, anyone sensitive to high ABV or heavy oak tannins, and value hunters who dislike paying a premium for limited single casks.

How is Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005 rated?

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict — 8.6 lands squarely in the "Very good" band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

0–1
1–2
2–3
3–4
4–5
5–6
6–7
7–8
8–9
9–10

Rum reviews

A selection of the most popular reviews from our community. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by Dr.Django

Sep 2024315 reviewsGermany
9.3/10

Direct comparison in a blind tasting between the two sister casks. Almost identical key data. Two outstanding bottlings. Both fight on the dark side of the force with wet wooden swords peppered with dark cherries and blackberries. A bit of funk shines through as the aromatic swords clash. The aromas explode when they clash until there is nothing left and both opponents lie exhausted on the ground. Then 12464 has the longer breath. RX12502 The finish seems to evaporate, but loops and comes out fruity and lingers. and lingers for a very long time. brilliant! RX12464 Brilliant. An absolute favorite of mine. Two excellent rums.

Review by Galli33

Galli33
Apr 2023478 reviewsItaly
8.5/10

First impression trough the nose: light ester, fruity, glue; just like a good old LP. But once you take of the cap of the glass this smells disappear quickly, only the smells of the barrel remain. Same thing on the palate… It’s a bit fruity (coconut) similar to a foursquare. After the fruity notes the barrel/roasted notes take the overhand. The finish is woody with a hint of fresg coconut graters. Second impression: Much Much better, found some licorice, minty and coconut notes. Very lovely. The finish remains woody. +2 in rating Although it’s not bad, it’s still a good balanced, complex rum. The alcohol is integrated well too.

Review by Basti

Apr 2025485 reviewsGermany
9.1/10

The rum is definitely unfiltered. Black sediment is still clearly visible in the glass. For me, this is a rather atypical Jamaican with notes of coconut and fruit. However, it is exactly to my taste. Alcohol almost perfectly integrated. If I were blind, I'd probably go for a Bajan rum rather than a Jamaican. I like it a little better on the second tasting. The bottle is now half empty and I still like it very much. Edit: Tasted again against the TWB. Both are very similar on the nose and there are hardly any differences. The RDL is a little more sticky at first, but this subsides with time. On the palate, the RDL is a little spicier and has more barrel influence. For me, both are very good bottlings! Edit: Still one of the best 2005 VRWs for me, although they are all very close together. Quite undervalued in my view.

Review by cigares

Aug 2023900 reviewsSwitzerland
8.4/10

Day 9 of the Samples de Luxe calendar. A sweet nose with a little alcoholic spiciness. Tutto frutti with varnished wood and marzipan. You can feel the watts in the mouth, whoa! But it remains balanced. The finish seems short, but the marzipan and cola linger for a long time. A pleasure rum, but neither the most complex nor the deepest. But balance and power are there. I made a blind Foursquare bet. The empty glass lets sweet aromas develop. Delicious.

Review by Timo Groeger

Dec 20241,635 reviewsGermany
9.0/10

I think these high-proof rums from Romdeluxe are really great, although this one has less %e. Nevertheless, it's a great long pond, with lots of esters and tropical fruits like mango on the nose and palate. There's also some glue on the nose. Delicious.

Review by LukaŽiga

Feb 2025680 reviewsSlovenia
8.8/10

8,8:On the nose, the first impression we get is with glue and esters, the tropical fruits and wood are secondary, as we notice tempting, sweet marzipan, spicy vanilla, the coconut is toasted, the nuts roasted and molasses vegetal and dark with licorice. 8,8:On the palate, the attack is estery with syrupy tropical fruits like mango, intense because of high ABV and sweet with charred wood notes like caramel and nuts, spicy with vanilla and pepper.The coconut is again toasted, the molasses vegetal, herbaceous.Our tasting buds are screaming of delicious notes, when the rum becomes very balanced with yellow fruits, raisins and licorice.Menthol pops up later. 8,7:The finish is long with dark molasses, yellow fruits, spicy, roasted wood, toasted coconut, dried fruits and a bit tannic.. Edit:15.2.25, 0.1 up

Rate

Community purchases

64 bottles logged by 52,000+ RumX members. The ratio of closed / opened / emptied, indicates whether this rum is meant to be drunk or is a collector's item.

29 Closed In collections, sealed
2 Opened Being poured right now
6 Emptied Finished — came back for more
21% Open rate Share that isn't sealed

Also on the wishlist of 25 members.

In the app
Track the market value of each bottle in your collection
Live auction-house prices, retail drops, and RumX community trades — updated daily.
Download app →

About the Long Pond distillery

The Long Pond distillery is located in Jamaica. Rums from Long Pond have been reviewed 6,621 times with an average of 8.5/10.

To Long Pond →

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Don't miss out on any more deals on Romdeluxe Long Pond Wild Series Rum Jamaica No. 26 VRW 2005.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver — together with Jakob, Robert and Lukas, we started RumX in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as a digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence — without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →
52,000+ Active tasters
280,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.