Aroma visualization from community tastings
T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002
Anyone curious about Trinidad's minty side will find their bottle here. This 21-year TDL leads with fresh mint, menthol and eucalyptus, backed by oak, yellow stone fruit (peach, lychee) and a faint "dirty" tar note. Several tasters call it herbal and green rather than sweet, with the 58.4% cask strength sitting surprisingly mild. A couple wished for more fruit up front.
The community says- Fresh mint and menthol
- Well-integrated alcohol
- But: Menthol not for everyone
View price history
10 more payment methodsSecure payment Sold by Inn-out-shop Returns & cancellation
- Secure payment. You pay via RumX with PayPal, Klarna or card. Your payment data is encrypted and we never store your full card details.
- Clear seller. Sold and shipped directly by the partner shop. And you're never on your own: RumX handles support and communication with the shop, so you always get excellent service, whichever shop you order from.
- Honest shop ratings. The stars show your service experience with the shop, not the rum score. They come from RumX users, and critical ones stay visible.
- Returns & cancellation. Your purchase contract is with the shop, so returns and cancellations run through them under their own policy and your statutory rights. If anything goes wrong, RumX helps you sort it out.
Buy T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002:
Offer details
Prices & availability last updated on
The look inside the bottle
How does T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002 taste?
Aggregated from 84 community reviews.
Minty, herbal old Trinidad with oak Most tasters rate it a very good 2002 TDL — mint, menthol and herbs over oak and peach, with well-integrated alcohol. A few find it slightly wood-forward or wish for more fruit.
Fans of minty, herbal, oak-driven Trinidad rums
Anyone who dislikes menthol or eucalyptus notes
How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.
Which glass for which rum? The community guide →
40 of 84 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums
Recommendation
Your next rum
One difference each to this rum.
Rated better
Clarendon Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 27 EMB 1995
8.9/10259 €
More intense
T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 65 2010
8.7/1099 €
Similar rating, cheaper
Beenleigh Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 40 Australia 2007
8.5/1096 €First choice: 21 of 26 tasters who tried both prefer it.
How is T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002 rated?
RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 8.6 sits in the “Very good” band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →
Community voices
What does the community say?
99% rate it 8 or higher. 19 selected write-ups from 84 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.
Review by lukasdrinkinghabits
For me, the first RdL is still the king of the 2002 TDLs. Unfortunately, the sample has been empty for a long time. Here in the crosstasting between the second RdL, the old RA, the RC and the TWJ for Macau, it's probably all about the other places on the podium. I've had the RC in my glass a few times and have always found it difficult to rate it. On the nose it is fruitier but also greener than the RdL #2, the herbs are not as unique here as in the others. Instead, the mango and peach are more pronounced. As in the RA, there are citrus notes here that are reminiscent of bergamot or grapefruit, but are somewhat more acidic overall than in the RA. As in the nose, the mint is not such a dominant note. In the finish, I have a long-lasting freshness like after brushing my teeth and perhaps a clear mint for the first time. It's actually much better than I remember from my first approaches. For me, it's on a par with the RA.
Review by Dr.Django
Direct comparison between 3 T.D.L 2002 single casks: 1st RC RX19670: 85 points 2. FRC RX13557: 80 points 3. Rom Deluxe RX20525: 88 points The RC and FRC are similar in profile, with herbs and yellow fruit. The FRC's higher abv is noticeable, and the alcohol could also be better integrated here. The RC has a longer finish. In general, the RC is much more pleasing and more fun. The Dane has a completely different profile, dark fruit, more old wood and more mint. On the palate, it is very dry, intense and heavy, which I really like. I like it best of the three.
Review by Frank
A beautiful, old Trinidad. Nose: the typical fresh mint right up front. Intense and simply delicious. Next to it, sour-sweet fruits such as gooseberry and passion fruit with a splash of lime, rounded off with apricot. A light caramel sweetness in the background and a contrasting vinegar-like note. I like it very much. 8.8 Palate: fresh mint up front, now with a little more eucalyptus and slightly salty-bitter. Immediately has a bacony effect, interesting! Gets a slight fruity twist in the direction of gooseberry, but the bacony umami mint remains. Beautiful Trinidat profile with a very respectable age. 8.6
Review by Beancheese
This one surprised me a little. Aside from Caroni’s I typically have not been a big fan of Trinidadian rums. I’ve found them interesting but just not what I’d want to be sipping on. Maybe I need to make the effort to try more after this one. This one has woody character on nose and palate but also has lots of herbal and mint/menthol notes. There was quite a bit of stone fruit on the nose as well, although I feel that was largely lost on the palate. I don’t usually love the wood forward rums but this one was kept in check by the prominent herbal and mint notes that kept it fresh, balanced and saved it from being too heavy. Nice complexity, surprisingly pleasant and it has me interested in keeping an open mind to more Trinidadian rums moving forward.
Review by Schnubbii
Tasted against TDL CDI 2003 / RX1629, TDL RA 2002 / RX7783 and TDL RdL 2002 / RX15565. All 4 rums were allowed to breathe for about half an hour. Nose: The RC 44 is somewhat closed on the nose, but you can subtly perceive bright fruits and very light mint. The CDI 2003 is even more closed, the only thing I perceive is some mirabelle plum or peach. The RA 2002 has a very slight hint of caramel. The RdL 2002 is also quite closed, here I find only very slightly light yellow fruits. Palate: For a 2002, the RC 44 is comparatively herbaceous and bitter on the palate and less sweet. The bright yellow fruits are somewhat in the background and instead it has more herbs. A little water does not necessarily help it to open up further. In comparison, the CDI 2003 is more floral, somewhat fruitier and sweeter and also less bitter. The CDI 2003 doesn't necessarily improve with a little water either, but it does become more drinkable. With the RA 2002, I find a slight caramel at first, followed by light fruit and a slight bitterness. With a little water it opens up a little more and becomes more drinkable. A nice, well-balanced combination of bright yellow fruits and mint, with light caramel, dirt and a herbaceous bitterness in the background. The profile of the RdL 2002 is very similar to the RA 2002, but for me it is a good deal more complex and sophisticated, more multi-faceted. All the aromas of the RA are present, but here they are raised to a higher level. A little water helps to perceive the whole spectrum of aromas even better. Simply a really great rum! Finish: The finish is roughly the same for all 4 TDLs, with the mint lingering a little more in the CDI 2003, the caramel in the RA and the full spectrum of aromas in the RdL. Ranking: 1st RdL 2002 / 89 points 2nd RA 2002 / 87 points 3rd CDI 2003 / 86 points 4th RC 44 / 85 points
Review by Banana Joe
Mein erster Rum aus Trinidad und was soll ich sagen. Anders als alles andere was ich bisher im Glas hatte. Diese Minze ist echt Wahnsinn und passt hervorragend zum Rum. Ansonsten habe ich noch viel Piment in der Nase. Am Gaumen dann nochmal Minze overload. Aber eher die marokkanische Minze und weniger Pfefferminze. Auch hier überzeugt er mich und ist total anders als alles andere was ich bisher getrunken habe. Und wenn ich dann lese, dass er im Vergleich zu anderen Rums aus Trinidad etwas schwächeln soll kann ich es kaum erwarten, die anderen Vertreter aus Trinidad ins Glas zu bekommen. Mich hat er überzeugt, aber mir fehlen noch die Vergleiche.
Review by Gunnar Böhme "Bauerngaumen" 🤓
I have enjoyed the RC Ed. 44 in the 2-3 tastings so far, not outstanding, but really very good. Nicely spicy and not as "bright" as the FRC (RX18188) recently, but more like dark green, rich leaves with a less dominant menthol note. Contrary to other opinions, for me the TDL has nothing that suggests Caroni, but is a rum with a very typical TDL profile. But that doesn't necessarily mean anything, it's just a personal impression. In any case, I would have given the rum 88 points at the first tasting, and today, after a tasting with a lot of time, I raise it to 89 points with a clear conscience - excellent choice of cask, Dirk!
Review by RumTaTa
Tasted together with RA T.D.L 2002 The rum club shimmers a shade darker in the glass. In direct comparison, the nose of the RA is more defined. The mint in particular is more clearly recognizable. With the Rumclub, everything is a little masked. It seems to want to make up for this on the palate: a real herbal explosion sets in after 1-2 seconds! At this point, the RA becomes more "dirty" and the Rumclub stays more with the herbs and floral notes and is clearly sweeter and fruitier. This continues in the finish: the RA dabbles more in the dirt while the Rumclub remains very straightforward with the mint, sweetness and fruit. Very good rum, for me one point behind the RA, which seems more versatile and complex. I have to say that the bottle of RA has been open for a while, so the comparison is a little off.
Review by mto75
The 2002 / 21yr RC Ed. 44 has to prove what it can do against the 2001 / 21 yr Rasta Morris. The RC is a little paler in color, on the nose it is also a little more restrained than the RM. The RC is more on herbal candy and medicinal notes. The RM is more on dried fruit / passion fruit and dirty notes. On the palate, the RM is more intense and has a longer finish. Conclusion: I like the RC, but if I had to choose one of the two, it would be the RM.
Review by Jarek
Today a small TDL tasting, with RX13557, RX 944, RX15670, RX 19670, RX15565 and RX20525. The impression of the first tasting is confirmed. Not a bad TDL, with herbs, mint, eucalyptus and other herbal notes. It is also fruity, but without the currants that I know from some other TDLs. Compared to the CDI, the RC is fruitier and the lower ABV also makes the RC more accessible. Overall, however, it is at the lower end of today's TDL scale.
Review by Boletus
Takes some time in the glass to release its initial woodiness and develop the lovely, light fruity aromas of peaches and lychees, giving the rum a nice complexity. Far in the background, it also has a medicinal side that reminds me a little of a mixture of Pinimenthol and a tar cream. I would have liked even more fruitiness, but I also really like this T.D.L. as it is.
Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
#5015 31.12.2024 Enjoying a set of samples while cooking New Year Dinner. Nose Wood, light roasted, light tannins, dried fruit, light mint, faint herbs, light citrus. Palate Oily, fresh, wood, light tannins, light mint, light citrus, dried fruit, faint chocolate, spice, faint herbs. Finish Long and warm, fresh, wood, light tannins, light citrus, mint, light berries. The empty glass has light chocolate, menthol, light smoke and light caramel.
Review by Andi
On the nose, a nice fruity note at first, with wood, chocolate and a hint of eucalyptus. On the palate again fruit, yellow fruit, again wood with chocolate, a slight bitterness that comes across very pleasantly. This is followed by great fresh eucalyptus notes that remain present in the finish. The 15 years of tropical maturation suit it very well, beautiful complexity. Excellent rum in my eyes.
Review by Master P
Nice fruity note, with wood and chocolate. There is also a bit of mustiness. On the palate again fruit, yellow fruit, wood with chocolate, a slight bitterness that comes across very pleasantly and a little tar. Fresh tea notes then come through and remain present in the finish. Excellent rum in my eyes. Not quite cheap but really tasty.
Review by Christian Rudt
Now the Rumclub also has its TDL from 2002 and this is already very round on the nose with lots of yellow fruit and almost perfectly integrated alcohol. The palate is also typical TDL with peach, mint and menthol, but it is "dirty" at best in the approach, but it remains a well-balanced, very drinkable bottling.
Review by F.L.O.
Der nette TDL von nebenan und jeder könnt es sein… Bodenständiger TDL mit Eukalyptus, Menthol, Holz und einer leichten Bitterkeit. Super Daily sipper, aber kein Exot oder Ausnahmetalent. Der Preis ist mir dafür ein bisschen zu hoch angesetzt. Meine volle Flasche wird wohl weiterwandern müssen.
Review by Fuwi
I'm sorry. But TDL and I, that's just not going to happen anymore. Has really great flavors, but those menthol and eucalyptus notes just aren't mine. Besides that, really nice complex notes, well integrated ABV and great, fruity nose. If you like menthol: enjoy 😎
Review by Timo Groeger
I don't know if I've ever had a rum like this before. The first thing that hits your nose is clearly mint, and then the same on the palate. There's also menthol and eucalyptus. It burns a little accordingly, but I like it.
Review by DomM
Comparatively closed up on the nose. Rather wood forwards on the nose as well as on the palate which reduces the liveliness of the profile somewhat. Enjoyable bottling with all the right 2000s TDL markers, just not my favorite out of the bunch.
No reviews match this filter.
Expert reviews
Reviews from RumX's blog partners, independent experts who have tasted, evaluated, and described this rum..
Expert review by Rum nagykövet
Read full review →
Live auctions
Current bids for this rum at Europe's leading auction houses.
Market value
What this bottle last achieved at auction. A research indicator, not a forecast.
Auction results 140 € – 205 €
from 2 sales, latest 12/2025
Prices incl. buyer's premium — what a buyer pays, not what a sale nets you.
Avg. community purchase price 151 €
What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.
Details about T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002
A rum from Trinidad, bottled by Spirit of Rum, at 58,4%.
Community purchases
56 bottles logged by 43 collectors.
A drinker & collector.
28% opened, 6 emptied and repurchased.
What does T.D.L Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 44 2002 cost?
Community paid 129–156 €.
Current best price: 179.00 € – above the typical community range.
What members actually paid for their bottles. A typical range, not the current shop price. Full price & collection history in RX+ →
56 purchased · 86 tasted · 44 wishlist · as of
Read on in the RumX Guide
You may also enjoy
Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:
Ten Cane Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 42 2008
Ten Cane Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 42 2008Minty, smoky, intense cask-strength Trinidad
Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 37 (Navy Blend Next Generation)
Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 37 (Navy Blend Next Generation)Bright, fruity Navy blend, a touch light
Enmore Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 39 Guyana REV 2006
Enmore Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 39 Guyana REV 2006Heavy, roasted Guyana with prune and licorice
Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 55 (Navy Blend Rum HQNB) 2025
Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 55 (Navy Blend Rum HQNB) 2025Complex, oak-and-dried-fruit navy blend, neat
Enmore Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 22 REV 1994
Enmore Rumclub Private Selection Ed. 22 REV 1994Deep, oily Enmore: plum, black tea, dark chocolate
Hampden Rum Artesanal JMC Distillery C<>H 1990
Hampden Rum Artesanal JMC Distillery C<>H 1990Aged Hampden: pineapple esters, oily, oak-rounded
Never miss a price drop.
Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.
Oliver · FounderBy rum lovers, for rum lovers
I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.
What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.
Oliver, Stuttgart
About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
