The Origin: now available to everyone. While stocks last. →
14968ACF-EAAF-4DF4-8D39-85E11BD3DE6CEcuador Licores San Miguel SA
Licores San Miguel SA Ron San Miguel Solera 1952 Añejo 75cl bottle
Bottle
40%

Licores San Miguel SA Ron San Miguel Solera 1952 Añejo

Sipped neat it splits people down the middle. The nose promises sweet coconut, vanilla and orange, but the palate turns woody, spicy and cinnamon-heavy with a noticeable alcohol bite that isn't always well tucked in. One taster nailed the aroma as "like a f##n yankee candle." A few find it tastes sweetened, with a sugary burn on the finish some really dislike.

The community says
  • Coconut-orange nose
  • But: Harsh alcohol
  • But: Sugary aftertaste
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does Licores San Miguel SA Ron San Miguel Solera 1952 Añejo taste?

Aggregated from 78 community reviews.

Spicy, woody, cinnamon-heavy with an alcohol bite Middling verdict at best. The cinnamon-and-wood spice wins a few fans, but hot, poorly integrated alcohol and a sugary aftertaste leave many saying they wouldn't rebuy.

Perfect for

Those who like sweet, spicy, cinnamon-forward sippers

Less suitable for

Anyone avoiding added sugar or hot alcohol

Style & occasion

How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.

Which glass for which rum? The community guide →

29 of 78 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

Recommendation

Your next rum

One difference each to this rum.

How is Licores San Miguel SA Ron San Miguel Solera 1952 Añejo rated?

RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 6.5 sits in the “Pleasant” band. 15% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 19% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

Community voices

What does the community say?

62% rate it between 6 and 8. 16 selected write-ups from 78 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by Timo Groeger

Timo Groeger
Mar 20241,872 reviewsGermany
6.5/10

Not the best rum. Quite sweet and very alcoholic. The taste lingers on the palate for quite a long time. You can taste a hint of chocolate, but otherwise it's almost all sweetness and alcohol. Doesn't get me.

Review by Martin Ekrt

Martin Ekrt
Oct 2024311 reviewsCzech
4.5/10

Nezajímavá vanilkovo cukrová vůně se špetkou skořice. Chuťově taky nezajímavé. Sušené ovoce a v závěru trochu citrusová nota, po které se nakonec rozvine nepěkná cukrovo karamelová pachuť. Toto mi vůbec nesedí. Edit: dopití vzorku a korekce dolů

Review by Johannes

Johannes
Sep 20232,879 reviewsGermany
6.5/10

Spicy, some cinnamon, alcohol not so well integrated.

Review by Rumpalumpa

Rumpalumpa
Rumpalumpa
Mar 2024282 reviewsGermany
6.9/10

Smells and tastes very cinnamony, which I like, but at some point it could get on my nerves if I had a whole bottle. The wood is also quite dominant, already turning bitter. Not too sweet

Review by Heffernan

Heffernan
Heffernan
Nov 202022 reviews
5.5/10

In der Nase anfangs recht alkoholisch und beißend, leichte Holznoten, beim zweiten Glas nicht mehr ganz so scharf, sogar ganz leichte fruchtige und würzige Noten erkennbar. Geschmacklich auch eine deutliche alkoholische Schärfe, die aber gerade so noch im angenehmen Rahmen liegt. Holznoten mit einer leichten Würze kommen durch. Insgesamt nur durchschnittlich, kein Muss, aber ich habe ihn recht günstig für umgerechnet ca. 20 Euro im Urlaub ergattern können und er erinnert mich an eine schöne Zeit. Mehr würde ich dafür aber ehrlich gesagt nicht ausgeben wollen.

Review by Lutz Lungershausen

Lutz Lungershausen
Dec 2022139 reviews
6.5/10

The fruity aromas are more fleeting, wood and roasted aromas remain

Review by rum_sk

rum_sk
Apr 2023245 reviewsSlovakia
6.8/10

Interesting with sweet 👃 including coconut, orange, fruits, bit of spices, orange peel. 👅 includes a lot of spices, black pepper, cinnamon, again orange peel with bitter aftertaste that is medium long. Not bad as it is very interesting spicy and not overly sweet rum. One could guess it will be more sweet due to it's 👃 but it is rather woody, bitter and spicy with a bit of fruity sweetness. Add: Cardamom after a burp :P sort of A.H.Riise taste at the very distant end.

Review by Jo Hoo

Jo Hoo
Dec 202279 reviewsGermany
4.5/10

Geruch geht Richtung Rosinen und ich meine ein bisschen Zimt zu riechen, Alkoholische Schärfe kurz vor unangenehm.

Add your rating

Expert reviews

2 critics scored it, averaging 6.0/10. Reviews from RumX's blog partners, independent experts who have tasted, evaluated, and described this rum..

Expert review by The Dunder Hut

Whatever is used to sweeten this, is way too much. There is a sugary burn in the aftertaste I really dislike. The coconut is so intense, that I have doubts of it origins. Nobody should want this. I fyou want coconut there are far better options

Market value

Avg. community purchase price 35 €

What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.

How we calculate this →

Details about Licores San Miguel SA Ron San Miguel Solera 1952 Añejo

A Column Still Rum from Ecuador, distilled by Licores San Miguel SA, at 40%.

CountryEcuador
CategoryColumn Still Rum
DistillationColumn Still
ABV40%
Volume75cl

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

Community purchases

7 bottles logged by 7 collectors.

A drinker's rum.

42% opened, 2 emptied and repurchased.

4 sealed 1 open 2 emptied

7 purchased · 82 tasted · 8 wishlist · as of

About the Licores San Miguel SA distillery

The Licores San Miguel SA distillery is located in Ecuador. Rums from Licores San Miguel SA have been reviewed 93 times with an average of 6.4/10.

To Licores San Miguel SA →

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
53,000+ Active tasters
320,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant your rum Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.
` between two key/value pairs terminates the expression and Hugo fails the whole build with `unexpected "{" in operand`. Put notes here. `headerDeliveryCountry` feeds the aria-label of the destination picker under the express row (commerce/express-destination.js). The strip's visible text is rendered by Hugo itself in rx/price_block.html — nothing else needs seeding. */ -}}