The Origin: now available to everyone. While stocks last. →
D6074E39-D897-4906-91D6-30C0C4684AF8Martinique Depaz
Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002 70cl bottle
Bottle
View 2
Rum Agricole · 17 years · 61,6%

Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002

Dried apricot, glue and tobacco in the nose, then wood, leather, spice and a little coffee once it opens up. The 17 years show as deep, dry oak. Almost everyone loves the nose; the palate splits people — several find it drier and hotter, with the alcohol more present than the 61.6% suggests. One taster even caught sweet-wine and Calvados notes in the finish.

The community says
  • Complex fruity nose
  • Well-aged oak
  • But: Dry, bitter palate
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002 taste?

Aggregated from 48 community reviews.

Deep, dry aged agricole with a stunning nose A serious aged Depaz agricole most rate highly for its complex, fruity-woody nose. The common catch: the palate turns dry, bitter and spirit-forward, less generous than the aromas promise.

Perfect for

Agricole fans who want aged, woody, cask-strength character

Less suitable for

Anyone wanting a soft, sweet or gentle sipper

Style & occasion

How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.

Which glass for which rum? The community guide →

23 of 48 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

Recommendation

Your next rum

One difference each to this rum.

First choice: 15 of 26 tasters who tried both prefer it.

How is Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002 rated?

RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 8.8 sits in the “Very good” band. 97% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

Community voices

What does the community say?

96% rate it 8 or higher. 18 selected write-ups from 48 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by Jarek

Jarek
Apr 2024684 reviewsGermany
8.6/10

Franconian Rum Tasting Gang / 2024-04-19: Neisson Straight from the Barrel No. 26 vs. No. 252 vs. Depaz 2002 Barrel 706 Den Vergleich gegen die beiden Neisson-Abfüllungen gewinnt der Depaz 2002 locker. Da das Line-up aber nicht ganz fair war, muss er am nächsten Tag noch gegen den Depaz 2010 vom RumClub antreten. Beide in der Nase sehr fruchtig und würzig. Der 2002 vielleicht noch etwas würziger, gefällt mir hier auch leicht besser. Am Gaumen zeigt der 2002 noch etwas mehr Reife, aber der Alkohol ist viel aufdringlicher, obwohl er nur nicht ganz 2% mehr ABV hat. Insgesamt Gleichstand, mit minimaler Tendenz zum 2002er. Nach nochmals 20 Minuten im Glas dreht sich die Preferenz an der Nase wieder. Jetzt tendiere ich wieder zum RumClub 😂

Review by MJ97

MJ97
MJ97
Aug 202372 reviewsBelgium
8.8/10

Au premier nez j’ai directement eu des fruits à coques / noix qui sont ressortis. Après analyse j’ai un côté bois humide bien sympa, et de la gourmandise. Alcool super bien intégré, je le ressens quasi pas au nez. Après lecture j’ai des fruits avec de la pomme qui ressort. En bouche, ça pique un peu plus, c’est vif et frais. L’alcool est plus présent mais reste correctement intégré. Sur la finale la fraîcheur s’estompe et laisse place au bois humide que je ressentais et aux fruits. Gros contraste entre l’entrée en bouche et le retour de la finale, super plaisant parce que c’est pas linéaire.

Review by TheRhumhoe

TheRhumhoe
TheRhumhoe
Dec 2022918 reviews
8.7/10

Un Depaz à la fois hyper savoureux et très déroutant. Le nez est gourmand et aromatique, les notes de fruits secs et tropicaux se mêlent aux notes florales, aux épices, au boisé ainsi qu’au café et au chocolat au lait. On ressent une pointe de colle qui se marie bien au côté plus sucré et caramélisé. À l’inverse, on retrouve un rhum beaucoup plus rustre et sec au palais, tourné vers des saveurs herbacées, végétales et florales, des épices et du bois. On ressent une pointe d’amertume, du cuir et un côté salé original en complément. La finale est chaude, longue, tournée vers les épices, les fruits secs, le foin et le menthol. Un rhum très complet, complexe et au prix encore abordable, mais qui aurait été superbe avec plus de fruits et de gourmandise en bouche.

Review by RumTaTa

RumTaTa
Sep 2022452 reviewsGermany
8.9/10

Second tasting: I like very much, today I find in the aftertaste even Calvados! ( 2)Nose: the first thing I notice is that the alcohol is very restrained, nothing bites and stings the nose. And then there is a striking similarity with sweet wine (Trockenbeerenauslese)Palate: nothing more of sweet wine but strong alcohol and much barrel influence and floral notes. Slight resemblance to cognac.Finish: cool, the impression of sweet wine comes back again! Very good rum, a bottle I would not buy. For me it is too woody and too expensive, but I'm glad I have a sample.

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
Aug 20225,612 reviewsDenmark
9.3/10

This is a lovely and very well balanced rum and once rested you get the full experience. Make sure to save the empty glass for a few hours and then nose it again to get stronger notes of chocolate and spices. The nose is balanced, fresh and fruity with tobacco and light wood and chocolate. The chocolate is more obvious in the empty glass after a while. The palate is complex and very well balanced and fresh with wood, dried fruit, spice and light chocolate and coffee. The finish is long and oily with wood, dried fruit and chocolate. Price to quality is very good.

Review by Émile Shevek

Émile Shevek
Feb 2023380 reviewsItaly
8.8/10

Al naso è forte e pungente, lievemente acido, con solventi/catrame, confettura di frutta, tabacco, cioccolato al latte e cachaça. Al palato caldo e avvolgente con note di solvente/catrame, frutta rossa, legno, sale e spezie con una lontana idea floreale che si accompagna a quella acida e amara sul finale tipica Depaz che a mio gusto gli fa perdere qualche punto. Comunque ABV integrato pertettamente e finale abbastanza persistente Thanks JakobM

Review by crazyforgoodbooze

crazyforgoodbooze
Aug 20222,484 reviewsGermany
8.0/10

Sehr seltsamer overproof Agricole da er krasse Tendenzen zu manchem high ester jamaicaner aufweist. Ganz viel Kompost und Ester in der Nase die ersten 10 Minuten und auch geschmacklich leicht vergoren und salzig im Hintergrund. Für mich daher etwas schwierig zu beurteilen. Agricole Charakter kommt schon noch durch aber es kommt auch immer wieder dieser ungewohnte Funk mit rein!

Review by Serge

Serge
Apr 2024840 reviewsGermany
8.9/10

Unser Agricole Flight heute abend: Neisson straight from the barrel no26 vs. No252 vs. (Etwas unfair) den Depaz cask strength 2002 barrel 706 26 ist ganz nett, 252 gefällt mir etwas besser aber der Depaz der klare, deutlich reifere und interessantere Sieger mit super Nase (mit ganz leicht Jackfruit/überreifer Mango sowie etwas Kleber) und reichhaltigem Gaumen.

Add your rating

Market value

Avg. community purchase price 198 €

What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.

How we calculate this →

Details about Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002

A Rhum Agricole AOC from Martinique, distilled by Depaz, at 61,6%.

CountryMartinique
DistilleryDepaz
CategoryRhum Agricole AOC
DistillationColumn Still
ABV61,6%
Volume70cl
Age17 years
Vintage2002
Cask no.#706
Limited edition485 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

Community purchases

35 bottles logged by 23 collectors.

A collector's bottle.

5% opened, 2 emptied and repurchased.

33 sealed 0 open 2 emptied

What did the community pay for Depaz Cask Strength Small Batch 2002?

Community paid 130–210 €.

What members actually paid for their bottles. A typical range, not the current shop price. Full price & collection history in RX+ →

35 purchased · 48 tasted · 18 wishlist · as of

Read on in the RumX Guide

Depaz

Distillery

Depaz 

Avg Rating 8.1/10 over 140 Rums

Depaz is the rum born from a volcano. After Mount Pelee wiped out Saint-Pierre and his entire family in 1902, the orphaned Victor Depaz came back and planted cane on the very slopes that had killed them. The distillery he built in 1917 still stands at the foot of the volcano, and its agricole is among the most decorated on Martinique.

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
53,000+ Active tasters
320,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good your rum Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.
` between two key/value pairs terminates the expression and Hugo fails the whole build with `unexpected "{" in operand`. Put notes here. `headerDeliveryCountry` feeds the aria-label of the destination picker under the express row (commerce/express-destination.js). The strip's visible text is rendered by Hugo itself in rx/price_block.html — nothing else needs seeding. */ -}}