The Origin: now available to everyone. While stocks last. →
03A651E9-33F1-4BC5-8895-956415E59A8FMartinique Depaz
Depaz Small Batch 2002 70cl bottle
Bottle
Rum Agricole · 17 years · 64,9%

Depaz Small Batch 2002

"Needs time in the glass" is the line that keeps coming up, and it's earned — this cask-strength Depaz doesn't show everything at once. Green and red chili, coconut, honey, plum and a peppery, spicy nose that leans more exotic than classic agricole. Full, oily mouthfeel, and at 64.9% the alcohol sits surprisingly well. A few call it their favorite Depaz ever.

The community says
  • Chili and honey
  • Full oily body
  • Alcohol well hidden
Currently no offers for delivery to Germany.

The look inside the bottle

How does Depaz Small Batch 2002 taste?

Aggregated from 45 community reviews.

Complex cask-strength agricole, chili and honey Widely rated among the best Depaz has made — complex, intense, and worth the patience. A couple note the finish could hold longer, and it stays wood-forward late.

Perfect for

agricole fans who like cask strength and patience

Less suitable for

anyone wanting a quick, easy pour

Style & occasion

How the community classifies this rum. Each category takes you to similar rums.

Which glass for which rum? The community guide →

16 of 45 left detailed tasting impressions · Click an aroma to explore similar rums

Recommendation

Your next rum

One difference each to this rum.

How is Depaz Small Batch 2002 rated?

RumX’s 0–10 scale is strict: 9.0 sits in the “Excellent” band. 100% of tasters rate it Good or better; only 0% rate it below average. See the full rating guide →

Community voices

What does the community say?

96% rate it 8 or higher. 12 selected write-ups from 45 community ratings. You can view the complete list in our app.

Review by crazyforgoodbooze

Most helpful positive review

crazyforgoodbooze
Jul 20252,485 reviewsGermany
9.1/10

Unglaublich guter Fassstärke Agricole! Extrem Komplex und intensiv nach grünen und roten Chilis, etwas Kokos, Banane, Honig, Pflaume und Kirsche, sowie Ingwer und Kräuter. Das ganze geht im Gaumen genauso weiter und der Alkohol ist überraschend gut eingebunden. Dazu nicht zu holzig für einen so alten agricole. Im Abgang wird es etwas rauchiger, dazu kommt die geröstete Kokosnuss und etwas grüne Chili wieder zurück... Verdammt der macht richtig Spaß! 🤤 Wohl mit Abstand einer der besten depaz aller Zeiten wenn nicht sogar der beste!😍

Review by Pavel Spacek

Most helpful mixed review

Pavel Spacek
Aug 20251,326 reviewsCzech
7.5/10

Jako ten rum je dobrej, ale proc je kurwa tak kyselej po vine!

Review by Thunderbird

Thunderbird
Apr 20221,261 reviewsGermany
9.1/10

The needs time, in the glass and also when tasting!A very complex nose, which adheres to something old! Incredibly intense....also the palate is very diverse, from an old fruit, to wood to fine vegetal aromas...the same continues in the finish.... An excellent Agricoles!!! I am becoming more and more a fan of Agricoles at cask strength!!!

Review by SaibotZtar

SaibotZtar
Apr 2025528 reviewsGermany
8.7/10

Erstmal garnicht so ein typischer Agricole für mich jedenfalls. Sehr Würzig Pfeffrig in der Nase . Kandierte Früchte , Floral Blumige Noten . Sehr liebliche Süße legt sich in die Nase. Im Mund sehr kräftig Würzig und schön Fruchtig. Sehr lecker.... braucht aber seine Zeit im Glas .

Review by RumTaTa

RumTaTa
Sep 2022452 reviewsGermany
8.4/10

The nose is invitingly sweet (creme brulee!) and fruity. On the palate, the alcohol is evident and the flavor quickly moves towards wood and becomes bitter. This intensifies towards the finish. No doubt from the "technical data" a good rum, but no, with this Agricole I will not warm.The variant with 61.6% (RX5465) I like better, but will also not my favorite.

Review by Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰

Kevin Sorensen 🇩🇰
Mar 20235,618 reviewsDenmark
9.2/10

This is a tasting from 2020 and it's a great rum even at the price tag when released. A well rounded and nicely balanced rum with nice fruits and vanilla. Clear Agricole notes and the empty glass had a nice smoky note with some honey.

Review by Tschusikowsky

Tschusikowsky
Apr 2023498 reviewsSwitzerland
8.5/10

I like it a lot better the second time around. However, I still don't quite warm to it. I like the tropical influences such as chilli or coconut.

Review by Joachim Guger

Joachim Guger
Apr 2023459 reviewsAustria
9.0/10

The typical Depaz markers at a high level. Glue, dried fruit, licorice, honey and grass/sugar cane. Hammer nose! Insanely great mouthfeel. Full and oily. Now also woodier, hardly any fruit and freshness. Banana bread. The finish is a little weaker, could definitely be stronger and longer. 65%? Superbly integrated. Barrel maturity very restrained for its age. With this great rum, Depaz joins the haute volee of agricoles. Liberation, Neisson, (Chantal Comte) La Mauny and then Depaz.

Add your rating

Expert reviews

Reviews from RumX's blog partners, independent experts who have tasted, evaluated, and described this rum..

Market value

Avg. community purchase price 150 €

What members paid for this bottle, self-reported. Not a market value — the purchases are over three years old at the median and unverified.

How we calculate this →

Details about Depaz Small Batch 2002

A Rhum Agricole AOC from Martinique, distilled by Depaz, at 64,9%.

CountryMartinique
DistilleryDepaz
CategoryRhum Agricole AOC
DistillationColumn Still
ABV64,9%
Volume70cl
Age17 years
Vintage2002
Cask no.#702
Limited edition485 bottles

Embed this rum on your blog Create widget →

Community purchases

37 bottles logged by 30 collectors.

A collector's bottle.

10% opened, 1 emptied and repurchased.

33 sealed 3 open 1 emptied

What did the community pay for Depaz Small Batch 2002?

Community paid 110–209 €.

What members actually paid for their bottles. A typical range, not the current shop price. Full price & collection history in RX+ →

37 purchased · 45 tasted · 39 wishlist · as of

Read on in the RumX Guide

Depaz

Distillery

Depaz 

Avg Rating 8.1/10 over 140 Rums

Depaz is the rum born from a volcano. After Mount Pelee wiped out Saint-Pierre and his entire family in 1902, the orphaned Victor Depaz came back and planted cane on the very slopes that had killed them. The distillery he built in 1917 still stands at the foot of the volcano, and its agricole is among the most decorated on Martinique.

You may also enjoy

Rum enthusiasts who like this rum have also given the following rums high ratings:

Price alerts · in the RumX app

Never miss a price drop.

Set a target price in the app, and we'll let you know as soon as the rum becomes available at that price from one of our partner stores. This works for any rum on your wish list.

★ 4.8/5 on App Store & Play Store
Oliver, founder of RumX Oliver · Founder

By rum lovers, for rum lovers

I'm Oliver, and RumX began in 2018 as a small passion project in Stuttgart, back then under the name Rum Tasting Notes.

What began as my digital tasting diary is now the world's most comprehensive platform for rum fans, today carried by a small team with Jakob, Lukas and Katharina, with Robert supporting us as a freelancer. We combine the collective intelligence of our community with an integrated marketplace, so you can choose with confidence, without paperwork, detours, or expert jargon.

Oliver, Stuttgart

About RumX →YouTube channel (in German)
53,000+ Active tasters
320,000+ Independent reviews
25,000+ Rums catalogued
★ 4.8/5 iOS & Android app
As featured in
Stern Stuttgarter Zeitung Rumporter fizzz About Drinks

Rating guide

RumX's 0–10 scale is strict. Here's what each band means.

9.0–10.0 Excellent your rum Stash as many as you can afford. Tell no one.
8.0–8.9 Very good Bank a backup. Tell everyone you meet.
7.0–7.9 Good Buy one and recommend it to your friends.
6.0–6.9 Pleasant Solid, super glad I drank it.
5.0–5.9 Average Totally acceptable.
4.0–4.9 Drinkable Not vocally complaining.
3.0–3.9 Poor Wish I was drinking something else.
2.0–2.9 Very poor Nothing nice to say.
1.0–1.9 Unpleasant No, that's not for me.
0.1–0.9 Inedible Pour it out.
` between two key/value pairs terminates the expression and Hugo fails the whole build with `unexpected "{" in operand`. Put notes here. `headerDeliveryCountry` feeds the aria-label of the destination picker under the express row (commerce/express-destination.js). The strip's visible text is rendered by Hugo itself in rx/price_block.html — nothing else needs seeding. */ -}}